| ISBN |
9781032506623 (hardback) |
|
9781032506630 (paperback) |
|
9781003399490 (ebook) |
| ISBN/ISSN |
10.4324/9781003399490 doi |
| Märkused |
Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Sisukord |
Constitutional review and judicial-legislative relations in established democracies / Kálmán Pócza, Márton Csapodi, Gábor Dobos, Attila Gyulai -- The Austrian constitutional court : a human rights stronghold despite increasing judicial restraint / Susanne Gstöttner and Konrad Lachmayer -- The Belgian constitutional court : navigating between constitutional rights and consociational politics / Patricia Popelier and Laura Martens -- The Supreme Court of Cyprus : the centre of gravity within the separation of powers / Constantinos Kombos and Athena Herodotou -- The French constitutional council : the gradual emergence of a co-legislator? / Servane Le Dû -- The German federal constitutional court : a court unbound? / Oliver W. Lembcke -- High courts of Ireland : judicial restraint in a stable political environment / Brian M. Barry -- The Italian constitutional court : a powerful political institution / Luigi Rullo -- The Portuguese constitutional court : a cautious but effective judicial body / Ana Pinhal and Paula Fernando -- The Spanish constitutional court : the judicial politics of constitutional review and interpretation / Joan-Josep Vallbé -- The United Kingdom Supreme Court : radical outcomes from gradualist premises / Chris Hanretty and Lewis Graham -- Nordic courts : an example of cooperation and dialogue / Maija Dahlberg, Haukur Logi Karlsson, and Katalin Kelemen -- Western European constitutional courts in comparative perspective, 1990-2020 / Kálmán Pócza, Márton Csapodi, Gábor Dobos, Attila Gyulai |
| Märkused |
"Recent confrontations between constitutional courts and parliamentary majorities in several European countries have attracted international interest in the relationship between the judiciary and the legislature. Some political actors have argued that courts have assumed too much power and politics has been extremely judicialized. Yet the extent to which this aggregation of power may have constrained the dominant political actors' room for manoeuvre has never been examined accurately and systematically. This volume fills this gap in the literature. To explore the diversity and measure the strength of judicial decisions, the authors have elaborated a new methodology that is intended to give a more nuanced picture of the practice of constitutional adjudication in Europe. The work opens with an assessment of the existing literature on empirical analysis of judicial decisions with a special focus on Western Europe and a short summary of the methodology of the project. This is followed by 11 country studies and a concluding chapter providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of the results. The collection will be an invaluable resource for those working in the areas of empirical legal research and comparative constitutional law, as well as political scientists interested in judicial politics"-- Provided by publisher |
| Märksõnad |
konstitutsioonikohtud
|
|
riigiõigus
|
|
õigusloome
|
|
võrdlev õigusteadus
|
|
Lääne-Euroopa
|
|
1990-ndad
|
|
21. sajandi 1. pool
|
|
artiklikogumikud (vormimärksõna)
|
| Lisasõnad |
Constitutional courts -- Europe, Western |
|
Judicial review -- Europe, Western |
|
Constitutional law -- Europe, Western |
|
Legislation -- Europe, Western |
| Täiendkirjed |
Pocza, Kalman, 1976- toimetaja
|
| UDK |
342.5 (4) (082)
|
|
342.7 (4) (082)
|
|
